Most vendors sell UI UX design services as one bundled line item, but UX and UI solve different problems, and a business overpays when it buys both without knowing which one it actually needs. Zethic diagnoses that first, then scopes UX design, UI design, or both against the actual gap.
Talk to us
85%
Long-term Partnerships
75%
Mid-to-Senior Engineers
5+
Avg. Years of Engineer Experience
98%
Would Recommend Us
Chances are one of these is true.
What you get from this work.
Our UI UX design services start with a diagnosis, not a default bundle. Each piece below can be scoped independently once the diagnosis is clear, or run as one connected process.
A scoped recommendation, not a bundled guess.
Task and conversion reviewStructural vs visual gapResearch & usability testingScoped recommendation
We run UX research and usability testing against the actual product before recommending a scope, so a business knows whether it needs UX, UI, or both. This often runs as our standalone design audit services when only the diagnosis is needed.
Navigation, task flow, and structure, independent of visuals.
User experience designArchitecture and flowJourney mappingStructural wireframes
User experience design here addresses navigation, task flow, and structure specifically, independent of how anything looks. Products that need this as a standalone, deeper piece of work can work directly with our user experience design services practice.
The visual layer on top of confirmed structure.
User interface designVisual design & typographyBrand-consistent craftAccessibility to WCAG
User interface design addresses the visual layer on top of confirmed structure: screens, states, and typography, scoped separately from UX. Products that need this as a deeper, standalone practice can work directly with our user interface design team.
Specs that survive the handoff, not a static file.
Design systems & prototypingComponent librariesRedline specs and statesQA against design intent
Design systems and prototyping tie the UX and UI work together into something engineering can actually build from, with specs that survive the handoff instead of a static file, the same rigor behind our dedicated wireframing and prototyping services. When the build is ours, it goes straight to our website development company in India team.
Intelligent Engineering, our team for the full-stack work behind every rollout.
Why teams pick us for this.
Quoting a full redesign before running diagnostic work is quoting a guess. We scope UX and UI separately once the actual gap is clear.
Our UX work traces back to research and testing, not opinion, the discipline behind what we found writing about UI UX impact on revenue growth.
Design systems and prototyping produce a component library the internal team can keep using after the project ends, not a refresh that drifts.
UI and UX design services here end in developer-ready specs and documented states, not a Figma link an engineering team has to reinterpret.
This is the discovery phase every UI UX design services project starts with, and it is how our services, part of Zethic's broader AI and digital solutions, move from a scoped diagnosis to a shipped product.
Talk to us{ 01 }· Week 1
We review usability data, run task-based testing, and separate the structural gap from the visual gap before recommending any scope.
{ 02 }· Week 2-4
Work proceeds against whichever discipline the diagnosis identified, structure, visuals, or both, priced accordingly.
{ 03 }· Week 4-6
Components and patterns get documented into a system built to hold up as the product grows past this project.
{ 04 }· Ongoing
Specs ship to engineering with direct support through the build, then post-launch fixes as needed.
Questions, answered.
Look at where the complaints come from. If users struggle to complete tasks despite the product looking fine, that's UX. If tasks complete fine but the product looks dated, that's UI. If both show up, a diagnostic audit is worth running first, and it can be bought as a standalone engagement before any design work is scoped.
Cost depends on which discipline the diagnosis identifies: a UI-only refresh costs less than a full UX restructure, and a combined project costs more than either alone. Most projects are quoted after the diagnostic stage.
A UI-only visual refresh usually runs three to four weeks. A full project with a combined UX restructure and design system typically runs seven to nine weeks, depending on scope.
Both. Most projects start as a scoped piece of work, then move into ongoing support for new features and design system maintenance once the initial build ships.
Handoff is part of the same scope: specs, states, and component documentation ship with the design, and the team stays available through the build, closing the gap so many approved designs never match what ships.
Tell us what's not working. A senior designer replies within one working day with a clear starting point.
Tell us the problem
What's not working, and what's already been tried. We sign an NDA first.
We diagnose before we quote
A senior designer separates the structural gap from the visual one first.
Scoped to what you need
UX, UI, or both, priced against the actual gap, not a default bundle.
Tell us what's not working. A senior designer replies within one working day with a clear starting point.
