Banking third-party risk software
Zethic Vendor Lifecycle Management is a third-party risk system that holds diligence, contracts, assurance and exit plans in one record per vendor. Tier vendors by criticality, track SLAs and renewals, and see where concentration risk sits.
What it is
A vendor list and a contracts folder cannot tell a supervisor which arrangements are material, when each was last assured, and what the tested plan is to exit it.
This holds the whole arrangement in one record: diligence, tier, contract terms, assurance evidence, SLA performance and the exit plan with its trigger conditions.
Capabilities
The whole third-party lifecycle on one record instead of four functions and a spreadsheet.
Ownership and financial checks, sanctions and adverse-media screening, information security, data-protection and business-continuity reviews, each with an owner, evidence upload and sign-off.
Each arrangement is scored on customer impact, data classification, substitutability, recovery time and materiality under your regulator's definition, and the tier drives every downstream obligation.
Service levels, liability caps, audit rights, sub-contracting restrictions, data-location clauses and notice periods are held as structured fields, with renewal alerts on configurable lead time.
Reviews run on a schedule set by tier, covering SLA performance, service credits, incident history, refreshed screening and updated security attestations, with owner attestation of continued suitability.
curl -X POST \ api.zethic.io/v1/outsourcing-register-exi \ -H "Authorization: Bearer ***"
A live register of every material arrangement with its service, tier, data locations and sub-contractors, plus a documented exit plan with trigger conditions and data-return obligations.
See it on your register
Bring one material outsourcing arrangement and its contract. We will build the record and produce the register export on the call.
Inside the platform
One record per vendor, the reviews around it, and the register above it.
Diligence, criticality tier, contract terms, assurance evidence and the exit plan all sit on a single record.
Scheduled reviews by tier, covering SLA performance, service credits, refreshed screening and owner attestation.
A live view of every material arrangement with its service, tier, data locations, sub-contractors and concentration.
Why teams switch
What changes when the vendor spreadsheet becomes one arrangement record.
See where several services quietly rest on one provider, and what would fail together.
Every material arrangement carries a documented exit plan with trigger conditions, reviewed each cycle.
Vendor master data syncs from your ERP, so the register never becomes a third list.
The workflow reflects the bank onboarding and audit-rights clauses we have been through as a supplier.
How it's different
Every row is a place the vendor spreadsheet leaves you exposed.
Diligence in inboxes, contracts in folders, the register rebuilt whenever it is requested.
One arrangement record from onboarding diligence through assurance to a tested exit plan.
How it works
The arrangement is scored on customer impact, data classification, substitutability, recovery time and materiality, and the resulting tier sets the oversight it carries for life.
Financial stability, beneficial ownership, sanctions and adverse-media screening, information security, data protection and business continuity - each with an owner, evidence and a sign-off.
Service levels, liability caps, audit rights, sub-contracting restrictions, data-location clauses and notice periods are recorded as fields, with renewal alerts scheduled at the same moment.
Assurance runs on the tier's cycle with SLA performance, refreshed screening and updated attestations, and the exit plan is reviewed against how the arrangement has actually changed.
See it before you commit
The cycle repeats for the life of the arrangement, with tier setting the intensity at every step so oversight effort tracks materiality.
Use cases
Situations where the vendor spreadsheet is exactly what fails under scrutiny.
It scores as material outsourcing, which triggers the full diligence set, a mandatory exit plan, data-location clauses and board visibility before signature.
Material outsourcing identified and governed before signature
The register shows one provider underpinning the payment gateway, statement generator, SMS channel and archival store, with a documented view of what fails together.
Shared-dependency exposure visible before it is tested
The notice-period alert reaches the named owner with the SLA history and open issues from the last two assurance cycles attached.
Renewal decided deliberately, with performance data in hand
The live register exports with every material arrangement, its tier, data locations, sub-contractors, last assurance date and exit-plan status.
Register produced from the live record, not rebuilt by hand
Integrations
It reads vendor, spend and incident data from the systems that already hold it, so the register never becomes a third list.
Security & compliance
How your contract terms, diligence findings and screening results are protected.
TLS 1.3 on every connection and AES-256 at rest across contracts, diligence evidence, screening results and backups, with rotating keys in a dedicated key store.
Tiering decisions, diligence sign-offs, contract term changes, assurance results and exit-plan revisions are logged with actor, timestamp, source IP and before-and-after values.
Procurement, legal, information security, business owners, compliance and audit each get a scoped view, and sensitive terms can be restricted to named groups.
Deploy on premise, in your own private cloud tenancy, or in a regional cloud region you nominate. Zethic holds no copy of production data.
Why choose us
A young product, conservatively designed, built by a team assessed from both sides.
Book a demoZethic has been through bank vendor onboarding, security questionnaires and audit-rights clauses as a supplier, so the workflow reflects which questions carry weight.
The data model starts from what an outsourcing register must show - materiality, data location, sub-contractors, assurance date, exit status.
Run it in your data centre or your cloud tenancy, with your keys and your backup policy. Contract terms never sit in a vendor-operated environment.
Start with the material outsourcing arrangements only, prove the register and the assurance cycle, then extend down the tiers.
Client reviews. Real outcomes.
“We truly appreciated their dedication, technical expertise, and problem-solving approach.”
Young Onion
Department Head
“I was blown away by the knowledge the team had about creatives, e-commerce, website design, and optimization.”
Decathlon Sports India
Image Leader
“They have a good team of designers and project managers who help us with the designs using HTML, Angular, and React.”
Instarama
COO
“Their creativity stands out. A collaborative team that delivered high-quality solutions working closely with us.”
CodeGama LLP
Business Developer
“The product has become more intuitive and user-friendly. Load times dropped significantly after their work.”
Qoruz
Co-Founder
“Their commitment to timely delivery was impressive.”
CurleyStreet Media
Business Development Rep
“We truly appreciated their dedication, technical expertise, and problem-solving approach.”
Young Onion
Department Head
“I was blown away by the knowledge the team had about creatives, e-commerce, website design, and optimization.”
Decathlon Sports India
Image Leader
“They have a good team of designers and project managers who help us with the designs using HTML, Angular, and React.”
Instarama
COO
“Their creativity stands out. A collaborative team that delivered high-quality solutions working closely with us.”
CodeGama LLP
Business Developer
“The product has become more intuitive and user-friendly. Load times dropped significantly after their work.”
Qoruz
Co-Founder
“Their commitment to timely delivery was impressive.”
CurleyStreet Media
Business Development Rep
“Simply put, the quality of their code is excellent. They integrated third-party software and ensured GDPR compliance.”
VIA IOM
Director
“What impressed us most was how well they understood our brand and translated it into clean, thoughtful designs.”
GD Farm Fresh
Director
“Their team was patient, courteous, responsive, and technically proficient throughout the entire project.”
Studio by Nandita Manwani
Partner
“Zethic Technologies generally delivers on time and in line with our requirements – deployed in 30+ countries.”
SABA Hospitality
Executive Director
“Zethic built the features specifically to match our internal workflow and business needs. Professional and on time.”
Coral Publishers
Executive
“Zethic Technologies is a true partner.”
Geordana
CEO
“Simply put, the quality of their code is excellent. They integrated third-party software and ensured GDPR compliance.”
VIA IOM
Director
“What impressed us most was how well they understood our brand and translated it into clean, thoughtful designs.”
GD Farm Fresh
Director
“Their team was patient, courteous, responsive, and technically proficient throughout the entire project.”
Studio by Nandita Manwani
Partner
“Zethic Technologies generally delivers on time and in line with our requirements – deployed in 30+ countries.”
SABA Hospitality
Executive Director
“Zethic built the features specifically to match our internal workflow and business needs. Professional and on time.”
Coral Publishers
Executive
“Zethic Technologies is a true partner.”
Geordana
CEO
Frequently asked
Still unsure? Send us the question you actually need answered and a senior engineer will reply.
Book a demoTLS 1.3 in transit and AES-256 at rest across contracts, diligence evidence, screening results and backups, with keys in a dedicated rotating key store and cryptographic separation between deployments. Commercially sensitive terms can be restricted to named groups, and access to those records is itself logged.
You choose: on premise, in your own private cloud tenancy, or in a regional cloud region you nominate so data stays inside your jurisdiction. In every model the deployment belongs to you, encryption keys are yours, and Zethic holds no copy of production data.
Yes. Vendor master data, purchase orders and spend synchronise on a schedule from your ERP so the register aligns with the entities finance actually pays. Screening runs through your existing providers, and incident data can be pulled from service management. Where a system exposes no API, scheduled structured files are supported with reconciliation on both sides.
Every tiering decision, diligence check and sign-off, contract term change, assurance result, issue closure, exit-plan revision, permission change and configuration change - each with actor, timestamp, source IP and before-and-after values. The log is append-only and cannot be edited or deleted by any role, including a system administrator.
This product is early, and we would rather say so plainly. We are working with a small number of design partners rather than pointing at a customer list we do not have. What we can show you is working software, the security architecture and the integration approach - and we would rather earn the engagement on a scoped pilot.
Tell us how many third parties you manage, how many are material, and what the last register request cost you. A senior engineer will walk you through tiering, diligence, assurance and register export, then map a scoped pilot.
Share your context
Your vendor count, entity structure, regulator and where oversight breaks down.
See a live walkthrough
A working demo of tiering, diligence, assurance, concentration views and register export.
Get a pilot plan
ERP and screening integration, security review path, timeline and scope.
Tell us how many third parties you manage, how many are material, and what the last register request cost you. A senior engineer will walk you through tiering, diligence, assurance and register export, then map a scoped pilot.
