Building automated evidence-gathering and engineering controls to fast-track compliance with frameworks such as SOC 2, ISO 27001, GDPR, and HIPAA.
Talk to compliance team
85%
Long-term Partnerships
75%
Mid-to-Senior Engineers
5+
Avg. Years of Engineer Experience
98%
Would Recommend Us
You're probably here because one of these is true.
What we build into your program
Most compliance platforms are subscription dashboards that watch your systems from outside. We build compliance directly into how your infrastructure runs, with every control and audit trail engineered around your specific stack.
Evidence generated as your infrastructure runs, not before an audit.
Evidence collectionPolicy-as-codeCross-framework mappingControl automation
We engineer automation to generate evidence as your infrastructure runs, mapping a single control across SOC 2, ISO 27001, GDPR, and HIPAA simultaneously wherever the requirements overlap, instead of assembling proof by hand each time.
The actual technical controls an auditor checks for.
Access control evidenceChange management logsEncryption verificationContinuous monitoring
We build the actual technical controls an auditor checks for, not just the reporting layer on top of them. These controls are engineered into your systems directly, working alongside data protection and privacy engineering.
Clear ownership for every control and risk, enforced in production.
Risk register automationControl ownership mappingPolicy enforcementAudit trail integrity
We architect governance structures that assign clear ownership to every control and risk, so accountability does not disappear between teams. This closes the gap between having a policy on paper and enforcing it in production.
our cyber security practice, where compliance and governance is one piece of the stack.
Why teams pick us for this.
Most compliance providers sell a subscription that monitors from outside. We build automation into your infrastructure, so evidence reflects reality.
SOC 2, ISO 27001, GDPR, and HIPAA share significant control overlap. We architect one set of controls that satisfies multiple frameworks at once.
You work with the engineers building your compliance architecture, not a junior filling out a generic template.
From a single certification to a full multi-framework program, the architecture scales with how many standards you need to satisfy.
Senior and hands-on from the first call. Our approach puts you with the engineers building your controls, not an account manager.
Start a GRC engagement{ 01 }· Week 1
We inventory your existing controls against the frameworks you need, then mark where evidence is missing or being assembled manually.
{ 02 }· Week 2 to 3
We design the compliance automation, the audit-ready controls, and the cross-framework mapping that the gap analysis calls for.
{ 03 }· Build
We implement the controls in tested increments, wiring continuous evidence collection and audit trails into your existing infrastructure stage by stage.
{ 04 }· Launch
We cut the architecture over system by system, confirm the controls are holding, and stay on to adjust as frameworks or infrastructure change.
Questions, answered.
Automated compliance workflows generate audit evidence continuously as your infrastructure runs, rather than requiring someone to manually assemble screenshots and logs before each audit. Controls collect their own proof as they operate.
Those platforms monitor your systems from the outside and automate generic evidence collection. We engineer the actual controls into your infrastructure directly, so the evidence reflects real technical safeguards built for your specific stack.
Yes. SOC 2, ISO 27001, GDPR, and HIPAA overlap significantly in areas like access control and encryption. We map controls across frameworks wherever requirements genuinely overlap, paired with ongoing vulnerability management, so you are not rebuilding the same control three times.
It depends on how much manual evidence-gathering your current setup relies on. Teams starting from spreadsheets take longer than teams with some automation already in place. We scope the timeline after mapping your controls in week one.
No. We architect this automation around your existing infrastructure and tooling. You do not need to migrate systems or adopt a new platform to get audit-ready.
Tell us which frameworks you need and where evidence gets assembled today. A senior engineer replies within one working day, no sales script.
Tell us your frameworks
Which standards you need and where evidence lives today. NDA available.
A senior engineer replies
A senior engineer responds within one working day, not a support queue.
Get a clear approach
A control gap map, architecture plan, and audit-readiness timeline.
Tell us which frameworks you need and where evidence gets assembled today. A senior engineer replies within one working day, no sales script.
